Supermarket and security staff liable for injuries sustained in an assault outside its premises

By: Ian Fitzharris BL

or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments

High Court awards damages totalling €750,243.39 to an injured party for serious and permanent brain injuries sustained as a result of an assault, by a third party not joined to the proceedings, outside of a supermarket following his eviction by security staff, on the grounds that there was a duty of care on the proprietor (and its security personnel) to readmit the innocent plaintiff back into the establishment once it was reasonably foreseeable that he would be subjected to a serious and imminent personal assault, which itself could not be deemed a 'new intervening act' which should shield the establishment from liability.

Personal injuries - assault by third party following eviction from premises by defendant's security staff - factual sequence of events - no contributory negligence on plaintiff's part - whether a duty of care arose - injuries to plaintiff reasonably foreseeable once he was denied readmission - just and reasonable to impose duty of care - novus actus interveniens - whether an unbridgeable chasm between defendants' actions and the actions of the assailant - failure to readmit plaintiff and pushing him back towards danger - injury foreseeable - concurrent wrongdoers - civil liability legislation - separate plenary proceedings issued against assailant but now statute barred (personal injuries claim only)- meaning and purpose of concurrent wrongdoer legislative provision - live unbarred action for trespass to person against assailant - legislative provision does not require a live personal injuries action to be extant - quantum - brain injuries serious and significant - permanent deficit - damages - actuarial reports regarding future loss of earnings - future promotion would have taken place - general damages - book of quantum of no real significance given injuries sustained - case to be looked at in the round.

Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.

or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *