Dispute concerning payment to contractor was subject to arbitration clause

By: Mark Tottenham BL

or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments

High Court grants order referring construction dispute to arbitration, notwithstanding a claim by the contractor that the employer had agreed to pay the disputed sum, on the grounds that: (a) an arbitration clause should be interpreted in broad terms such that the dispute could be said to 'arise under' the relevant agreement; (b) the contractor had failed to establish any representation by the employer such that the employer was 'estopped' from relying on the arbitration agreement; and (c) the claim by the contractor that the dispute arose from a subsequent agreement to pay the disputed sum was a variant of the claim that it had not arisen 'under' the original agreement.

Application for order referring proceedings to arbitration - Article 8(1) of the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration - arbitration agreement - application for a stay to enable conciliation - public works contract (PWC) - construction works at school - alleged debt of €206K - whether dispute arose under PWC or under a separate agreement - account stated and settled - agreement on behalf of defendant that outstanding sums would be paid - issue of summary summons - alleged defects in construction - claim for set-off - whether alleged final account was binding where individual did not have authority to make agreement - failure to provide certificate - Section 6 of the Arbitration Act 2010 - application of UN Model Law to domestic arbitrations - principles of interpretation of arbitration agreements - alleged estoppel - whether arbitration agreement had been superseded by alleged agreement reached at a meeting.

Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.

or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *