Monthly Archives: March 2013
Cleary v. DPP – SC – Judicial review, application to restrain trial, autrefois acquit
By: Mark Tottenham BL on 23/11/2011Cleary v. DPP [2011] IESC 43 (Supreme Court, Hardiman J, McKechnie J, O'Donnell J, 23 November 2011)
Hardiman J (McKechnie J conc)(Full text): Judicial review – appeal from dismissal – trial for assault causing harm – consent by DPP to summary disposal of charge – summary jurisdiction accepted by District Court judge – failure of prosecution to attend District Court hearing – subsequent charge on same offence – requirement of trial on indictment – whether abuse of process – failure to obtain CCTV footage – wording of District Court order dismissing complaint – s 14, Courts Act 1971 – second charge outside six-month time-limit for prosecuting summary offence – delay in commencing judicial review – whether judge had jurisdiction to dismiss complaint – failure of DPP to seek judicial review – equality of arms – imbalance between rights and powers of prosecution and those of accused – communi
Read More
Termination of employment restrained by interlocutory injunction.
By: Mark Tottenham BL on 23/11/2011Holland v. Athlone Institute of Technology [2011] IEHC 414 (High Court, Hogan J, 26 July 2011)
High Court grants injunction to restrain the termination of the plaintiff’s employment pending the final hearing of the action.
Read More
Holland v. Athlone Institute of Technology – HC – Employment, injunction, Croke Park Agreement
By: Mark Tottenham BL on 23/11/2011Holland v. Athlone Institute of Technology [2011] IEHC 414 (High Court, Hogan J, 26 July 2011)
High Court grants injunction to restrain the termination of the plaintiff’s employment pending the final hearing of the action.
Read More
In the matter of Mr Binman – HC – Company law, examinership, prospect of survival
By: Mark Tottenham BL on 22/11/2011In the matter of Mr Binman [2011] IEHC 401 (High Court, Finlay Geoghegan J, 2 November 2011)
High Court refuses petition for appointment of examiner to company, on grounds that there was no objective prospect of the company’s survival as a going concern.
Read More
Taaffe v. Judge McMahon – HC – Judicial review, uncontested application, measuring of costs
By: Mark Tottenham BL on 22/11/2011Taaffe v. Judge McMahon [2011] IEHC 408 (High Court, Kearns P, 28 October 2011)
High Court holds that it has jurisdiction to measure costs in uncontested application for judicial review, but adjourns decision for 28 days to allow the parties “either to agree costs or to prepare an appeal to the Supreme Court”.
Read More
F F v. Refugee Appeals Tribunal – HC – Judicial review, asylum, political activity
By: Mark Tottenham BL on 22/11/2011F F v. Refugee Appeals Tribunal [2011] IEHC 390 (High Court, Cooke J, 14 October 2011)
High Court refuses leave to seek judicial review of decision to refuse asylum.
Read More
A A v. Refugee Appeals Tribunal – HC – Judicial review, asylum
By: Mark Tottenham BL on 22/11/2011A A v. Refugee Appeals Tribunal [2011] IEHC 389 (High Court, Cooke J, 12 October 2011)
High Court refuses leave to seek judicial review of decision to refuse asylum.
Read More
Nateel v. Minister for Justice – HC – Judicial review, refusal of asylum, unreasonableness
By: Mark Tottenham BL on 22/11/2011Nateel v. Minister for Justice [2011] IEHC 392 (High Court, Hogan J, 27 October 2011)
High Court grants order of certiorari of refusal of asylum claim, where unreasonable grounds for refusal were given.
Read More
Anglo Irish Bank Corporation Ltd v. Collins – HC – Mortgage, guarantee, alteration after execution
By: Mark Tottenham BL on 21/11/2011Anglo Irish Bank Corporation Ltd v. Collins [2011] IEHC 385 (High Court, Dunne J, 13 July 2011)
High Court grants judgment to plaintiff bank in the sum of €6,882,970.06 in respect of loan and guarantee agreement.
Read More
Jama v. Minister for Social Protection – HC – Social welfare entitlement, access to previous decisions
By: Mark Tottenham BL on 17/11/2011Jama v. Minister for Social Protection [2011] IEHC 379 (High Court, Hedigan J, 11 October 2011)
High Court refuses application by way of judicial review for previous decisions of the respondent concerning social welfare entitlements.
Read More
